Seven in 10 U.S. workers say they’re “very” or “somewhat” concerned about employers using AI in HR decision-making, according to a Rutgers report.

“Everything is at stake,” says Ben Zhao of the University of Chicago, who leads the development of two tools that support human creativity.

Many artificial intelligence tools were trained on freely-available digital content. That might be legal, but is it ethical?

And investors will be hoping for more good news on that front when the company announces quarterly earnings.

Websites are making content “to try to game Google results,” says Mia Sato of The Verge. What has that done to human creativity?

MIT researchers estimate that artificial intelligence would be cost-effective in less than a quarter of the work it could technically do.

The key will launch Copilot, Microsoft’s AI assistant program. But whether users will take to it is an open question.

Deep learning, voice cloning and image tech are helping people with nonstandard speech express themselves and be better understood.

Where’s the line between fair use and commercial exploitation when it comes to scraping the web to train artificial intelligence models?

It’s been used for some time in applications designed to support, not replace, the work of human actors, writers and directors.